Histological Alterations in Placentas of Pregnant Women with SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Single-Center Case Series.

This study aimed to investigate the histopathological changes associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in placentas. A case series of anatomopathological analysis was conducted on the placentas of pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 who delivered between March and December 2020 at Santo Amaro Hospital (HSA) in Salvador, Brazil. Out of the 29 placentas examined, the median weight was 423.0 (IQR: 385.0-521.0) g. Among them, 58.3% (n = 14) had inadequate weight relative to the newborn's weight. The histopathological findings revealed that 86.2% (n = 25) of the placentas had poorly defined lobes, and the fetal and maternal surface color was normal in 89.7% (n = 26) and 93.1% (n = 27), respectively. Additionally, 51.7% (n = 15) of the umbilical cords displayed hypercoiling. The most frequent microscopic finding was infarction, present in 35.3% (n = 6) of the cases, followed by 11.8% (n = 2) for each of chorioamnionitis, chronic villitis, focal perivillositis, and laminar necrosis. Analysis of the umbilical cords identified 23.5% (n = 4) cases of intervillous thrombosis, while amnion analysis showed 13.8% (n = 4) cases of squamous metaplasia. Extraplacental membrane examination revealed fibrin deposition in 93.1% (n = 27) of the cases, necrosis in 62.0% (n = 18), calcifications in 51.7% (n = 15), cysts in 37.9% (n = 11), neutrophilic exudate in 17.2% (n = 5), thrombosis in 13.7% (n = 4), and delayed placental maturation in 6.9% (n = 2). All analyzed placentas exhibited histopathological changes, primarily vascular and inflammatory, which indicate SARS-CoV-2 infection in term pregnancies. These alterations could be associated with impaired placental function, fetal growth restriction, preeclampsia, and prematurity. However, further prospective studies are required to validate the type, prevalence, and prognosis of each of these changes.

Long-term outcomes of highly experienced people with HIV undergoing salvage therapy with raltegravir.

Raltegravir and other third-line drugs have shown promise in improving outcomes in treatment-experienced patients. However, the efficacy and tolerability of these agents vary. This study assessed real-life virologic success, long-term survival, and adverse events in patients receiving raltegravir or other third-line drugs as salvage regimens. This retrospective cohort study included adults who experienced treatment failure (human immunodeficiency syndrome-1 RNA plasma viral load >1000 copies/mL) and subsequently initiated raltegravir or other third-line drugs (darunavir/ritonavir, maraviroc, or etravirine). Propensity score matching methods were employed to account for differences at the time of switching from failing antiretroviral therapy regimens. The matched subset was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Generalized Wilcoxon tests to evaluate the probability of achieving virologic suppression (plasma viral load <50 copies/mL). Mortality rates, toxicity, treatment interruption, virologic failure, and loss to follow-up were determined using Poisson regression. One hundred and sixty-eight patients initiating salvage regimens were included, with 123 receiving raltegravir and 45 other third-line drugs. Propensity score matching resulted in a subset of 90 patients, 45 in each group. During the follow-up period, there were no significant differences observed between the groups in terms of virologic suppression (77.8% vs 82.2%, P = .73), mortality rates (4.04 vs 6.18 persons per 100 person-years [p-y]; P = .67), drug toxicity (0.00 vs 2.06 persons per 100 p-y; P = .49), treatment interruption (8.07 vs 0.00 persons per 100 p-y; P = .06), virologic failure (2.02 vs 4.12 persons per 100 p-y; P = .61), and loss of follow-up (6.05 vs 4.12 persons per 100 p-y; P = .70). Our findings indicate comparable survival and virological success rates between raltegravir and other drugs used in salvage regimens. Similar rates of drug toxicity, treatment interruption, virologic failure, and loss of follow-up were also observed. These results suggest that raltegravir may be a viable option for salvage therapy, demonstrating outcomes comparable to other third-line drugs in real life.